| Cover Story |
| Columns |
| Continuous Improvement: The Seven Secrets |
| Column | |
| By Mark Sutcliffe | |
| Monday, 28 April 2008 | |
|
Page 1 of 2 ![]() Seven lessons can lead to a successful implementation of continuous improvement programs. Hundreds of manufacturers have improved operational performance and gained a competitive advantage by implementing continuous improvement (CI) programs such as lean and Six Sigma. Nonetheless, risk-averse manufacturers are sometimes hesitant to pursue CI methods, fearing that they may be too drastic, unsustainable or abstract to apply in a practical and manageable manner. Luckily, the reasons some CI efforts fail are easily identifiable, and manufacturers can reduce risk and gain more confidence in pursuing CI programs if they are aware of common pitfalls. Manufacturers looking to implement CI programs that effect real and lasting change must approach CI methodically and map their path forward carefully. By examining strategies that have led to demonstrable results with other companies, we have boiled this down to seven key lessons. By effectively communicating project goals, scope and steps with employees at all levels throughout the program implementation, and providing them with ample training and input, manufacturers can manage this change more smoothly and secure employee buy-in. Also, many manufacturers that have involved shop-floor employees in CI projects from the outset have uncovered great ideas and identified considerations that might otherwise have been overlooked. They have also seen how deeper participation and understanding has given employees a sense of project ownership that has improved results. One common pitfall, however, is a trailing-off of executive support and involvement as the project progresses. This should be avoided at all costs, as it is antithetical to the concept of continuous improvement and can prevent a project from maintaining momentum and yielding ongoing results. One effective strategy for avoiding this is to form a steering committee with high-level executive involvement that continues to meet and evaluate program results over time. |
|
| < Previous Story | Next Story > |
|---|